Samir DelaneyCBS, CEP
Senior Compensation Analyst, Silverline Media
Victor Ueda· Job Architecture Lead, Independent
Posted in Job Architecture & Careers ·
There is a lot of enthusiasm for skills-based everything, so here is what happened when we tried it. We are a professional services firm in Singapore and Malaysia, about 2,800 people. In early 2025 we introduced a taxonomy of 410 skills alongside our 19 job families, intending skills to drive development and internal moves while families and levels stayed the basis for pay.
What worked: internal mobility. Around 140 people moved across families using skills matches, roughly double the previous rate. What did not: keeping skill profiles current. Self-assessed profiles went stale within months and managers validated under 20% of them.
We have since cut the taxonomy to 120 skills. I no longer believe skills can replace job families for pay, but I'd welcome a counter-view.
3 helpful · 1 insightful · 4 replies · 210 views · 1 following